|
|
|
|
|
|
A cue is more than just wood
|
|
Like in all other sports - billiard has its technical
terms.
In the below scheme you can see the different types of
cues on the market:
|
Type |
Type of wood |
Joint of |
Tip |
Tip-width |
| Standard cue |
ramin / maple |
|
screw-on-tip |
12 mm |
| 2-pcs., non-expensive cue |
ramin |
metal |
screw-on-tip |
12 mm |
| Skittle- and caromcue |
maple etc |
wood |
glue leather |
11-12 mm |
| Poolcue |
maple etc. |
metal |
glue leather |
12-14 mm |
| Snookercue |
ash |
metal |
glue leather |
9-10 mm |
The cheapest cues are standard cues (1 pc. cues)
which are made ramin-wood (tropical fast-growing wood
with little specific gravity). These cues are fragile and
will have a decreased life. If you want a better quality
of standard cue - you must choose the maple cue where the
wood is harder and will have a longer life.
When we talk about 2-pcs. cue with metal joint -
these also come in ramin- or maplewood. The manufactu-
res often focus on design wether than quality - so don´t
let yourself be blinded by the looks. These 2-pcs. cues
typically comes with screw-on-tips, which makes it very
easy to change tips.
If you are looking for a semi-professional cue - you must
choose a 2-pcs. maplewood cue with glue leather.
Skittle & carom cues mostly comes with
wood-joint, glue leather and in 2 pieces. The shaft is
usually made
of maple - but the butt can be of different kinds of
quality wood types. Some of these professional cues
have weight-regulation in the butt for the perfectionist.
Pool & snooker cues are traditionally with a
metal-joint and in 2 pieces. The tips on poolcues are
usually
12-14 mm wide and the leather is very hard. On snookercues
you will find the thinest tips of all - from 9-10 mm. The
leather is relatively soft and the good cues are made of
ash-wood.
You can buy an expensive
cue but with the wrong care and with in-correct use of the
cue - this will not turn
out any better than with a standard cue. So when you buy a
professional quality cue - remenber that the
cue is not any better than the beholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|